Adding support for .NET 10 #3686

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-10-13T16:14:03Z

Description

As part of adding support for .NET 10 below changes has been done:

Added conditional logic for PackageReference entries for assemblies which are now included in the .NET 10 Base Class Library. Without this change, keeping them caused runtime redundancy and potential NU1510 errors during SDK pruning:
- Sytem.Text.Json
- System.Text.Encodings.Web
- System.Buffers
- System.Memory
- System.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation
Enabled multi-targeting for .NET 10 in test projects to ensure compatibility and proper coverage.

Issues

#3576
Customer issue: #3522

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 11 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/UnitTests/TdsParserInternalsTest.cs

...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj

paulmedynski

I think your best bet will be to update the pipelines to install the .NET 10 SDK (instead of .NET 9 SDK), and ensure that we use .NET 10 SDK to build and run the test projects.

The driver projects must remain using .NET 9 SDK to build.

Hmm... I don't think we can separate this out in our current pipelines. Let's just use the .NET 10 SDK for everything and see how it goes.

.../AzureKeyVaultProvider/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.AlwaysEncrypted.AzureKeyVaultProvider.csproj

...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj

...osoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/PerformanceTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.PerformanceTests.csproj

src/Directory.Packages.props

mdaigle · 2025-10-15T18:11:53Z

The driver projects must remain using .NET 9 SDK to build.

@paulmedynski I've been thinking about this. We can start publishing a .NET 10 dll with only a minor version bump. Maybe we target our spring 7.1 release for that addition. At that point it should be better supported in all the build tooling.

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-10-31T08:47:46Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2025-10-31T08:47:53Z

Azure Pipelines will not run the associated pipelines, because the pull request was updated after the run command was issued. Review the pull request again and issue a new run command.

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/Directory.Packages.props:49

The condition for Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting should be updated to include net10.0, similar to the other updated conditions in this file. Currently, net10.0 builds will fall into the 'not equal' condition on line 53, which may not be the intended behavior given the pattern established elsewhere in this file.

  <ItemGroup Condition="'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net9.0'">

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

apoorvdeshmukh · 2025-10-31T10:21:31Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2025-10-31T10:21:42Z

Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s).

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-10-31T10:28:42Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2025-10-31T10:28:52Z

Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s).

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-10-31T11:07:04Z

/azp run

azure-pipelines · 2025-10-31T11:07:14Z

Azure Pipelines failed to run 2 pipeline(s).

paulmedynski

It would also be nice to expirment with the workaround documented here to see if we can eliminate the ensure-dotnet-version.yml template:

microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks#16501 (comment)

And the alternate way to determine architecture here:

microsoft/azure-pipelines-tasks#20300 (comment)

That would de-clutter the job steps that look like we're repeatedly trying to install SDKs and remove our PowerShell foo.

eng/pipelines/common/templates/steps/build-all-configurations-signed-dlls-step.yml

...sts/tools/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ExtUtilities/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ExtUtilities.csproj

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

Frulfump · 2025-11-15T13:36:48Z

Any progress here now that .NET 10 is GA?

ErikEJ · 2025-11-15T13:51:55Z

@Frulfump What are you missing in order to use SqlClient with .NET 10?

Frulfump · 2025-11-15T13:58:11Z

@ErikEJ not sure haven't tried it yet trying to be proactive here but given the name of this issue #3576 and the title of this PR "Adding support for .NET 10" it doesn't paint a picture of it being fully supported so hoping to get the wrinkles sorted out before I waste my time on something that might not be fully supported.
(Also the linked customer issue in this PR #3522)

paulmedynski · 2025-11-15T15:18:59Z

MDS won't be targeting .NET 10 since we don't use any APIs specific to .NET 10. If that changes, we will add .NET 10 as a target framework.

This PR's goal is to ensure MDS can be built using the .NET 10 SDK. We will be updating the pipelines to use the .NET 10 SDK, and updating the tests to target .NET 10 to ensure things work in that runtime as well.

In the meantime, you can try using the .NET 10 SDK to build and test MDS. I have been using it without issues for a while.

C0nquistadore · 2025-11-18T14:13:38Z

MDS won't be targeting .NET 10 since we don't use any APIs specific to .NET 10. If that changes, we will add .NET 10 as a target framework.

I would be glad if you would reconsider targeting .NET 10 aswell, because right now without it, it can't be used on a project that targets .NET 10. A project that targets .NET 10 and references Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 6.1.3 throws the following exception during SqlConnection.Open:

System.TypeInitializationException
  HResult=0x80131534
  Message=The type initializer for 'Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.LocalAppContextSwitches' threw an exception.
  Source=System.Private.CoreLib
  StackTrace:
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.InitHelpers.InitClassSlow(MethodTable* mt)
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.StaticsHelpers.GetNonGCStaticBaseSlow(MethodTable* mt)
   at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.LocalAppContextSwitches.get_UseConnectionPoolV2()
   at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ConnectionPool.DbConnectionPoolGroup.GetConnectionPool(DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
   at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnectionPool(DbConnection owningObject, DbConnectionPoolGroup connectionPoolGroup)
   at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.TryGetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions, DbConnectionInternal oldConnection, DbConnectionInternal& connection)
   at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionInternal.TryOpenConnectionInternal(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions)
   at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.TryOpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory, TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, DbConnectionOptions userOptions)
   at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.TryOpen(TaskCompletionSource`1 retry, SqlConnectionOverrides overrides)
   at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open(SqlConnectionOverrides overrides)
   at Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
   at Program.<Main>$(String[] args)

  This exception was originally thrown at this call stack:

Inner Exception 1:
FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager, Version=9.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=cc7b13ffcd2ddd51'. The system cannot find the file specified.

The current workaround is to manually reference System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager 10.0.0.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 23 out of 23 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

src/Directory.Build.props

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft/Data/SqlClient/Server/SqlNormalizer.cs

cheenamalhotra · 2025-12-02T23:39:53Z

@paulmedynski @priyankatiwari08
I think enabling .NET 10 targets in pipelines is going to blow up server instances used in tests and will increase failures due to resource limitations (e.g. xevent, enclaves, etc.) and our environments may not be ready for adding 100 more jobs to all pipeline runs. I'd recommend we wait for pipeline refactoring before extending pipelines to test with .NET 10.

codecov · 2025-12-03T01:40:00Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.84%. Comparing base (995df25) to head (dec7e69).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/Microsoft/Data/SqlClient/Server/SqlNormalizer.cs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (995df25) and HEAD (dec7e69). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag BASE (995df25) HEAD (dec7e69)

addons 1 0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3686      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.61%   69.84%   -6.78%     
==========================================
  Files         274      268       -6     
  Lines       43393    66432   +23039     
==========================================
+ Hits        33247    46400   +13153     
- Misses      10146    20032    +9886

Flag	Coverage Δ
addons	`?`
netcore	`69.87% <0.00%> (-6.81%)`	⬇️
netfx	`69.15% <0.00%> (-7.05%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

…ine test runs. - Removed unnecessary System.Text.Json and Microsoft.Win32.Registry package dependencies that were causing pruning warnings. - Updated MDS .nuspec dependencies to match what we actually depend on.

paulmedynski

Commentary for reviewers.

eng/pipelines/dotnet-sqlclient-ci-core.yml

eng/pipelines/dotnet-sqlclient-ci-package-reference-pipeline.yml

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/netcore/ref/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/netfx/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj

tools/specs/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.nuspec

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 26 out of 26 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

tools/specs/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.nuspec

Directory.Packages.props

Copilot

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-12-03T17:59:43Z

@dotnet-policy-service agree [company="Microsoft"]

priyankatiwari08 · 2025-12-03T18:00:23Z

@dotnet-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

…ard 2.0. - Removed some unused packages. - Removed .NET 10 targets from CI pipeline runs.

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/netfx/ref/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj

mdaigle

Previous comments document work to be done in the common proj file to align dependencies with target frameworks.

priyankatiwari08 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 16:14

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 13, 2025 16:14

priyankatiwari08 marked this pull request as draft October 13, 2025 16:14

Copilot AI reviewed Oct 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

apoorvdeshmukh requested a review from Copilot October 13, 2025 16:56

Copilot AI reviewed Oct 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/UnitTests/TdsParserInternalsTest.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

...crosoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

paulmedynski requested changes Oct 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

paulmedynski self-assigned this Oct 15, 2025

priyankatiwari08 requested a review from Copilot October 31, 2025 09:13

Copilot AI reviewed Oct 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

priyankatiwari08 marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 09:16

ErikEJ reviewed Oct 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

priyankatiwari08 requested a review from paulmedynski October 31, 2025 11:06

priyankatiwari08 added this to the 7.0.0-preview3 milestone Oct 31, 2025

paulmedynski requested changes Oct 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

priyankatiwari08 linked an issue Oct 31, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request

Prepare for .NET 10 SDK #3576

Open

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 2, 2025 18:23

paulmedynski dismissed their stale review via 29049f1 December 2, 2025 18:23

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of paulmedynski December 2, 2025 18:24 View session

- Fixed target frameworks for Unix parameters.

2b6e260

Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of paulmedynski December 2, 2025 18:29

- Fixed target frameworks for Unix parameters.

38332f3

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Directory.Build.props Show resolved Hide resolved

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft/Data/SqlClient/Server/SqlNormalizer.cs Show resolved Hide resolved

paulmedynski previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

- Removed unnecessary System.Text.Web.Encodings package from AKV.

0575bf2

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 3, 2025 13:44

paulmedynski dismissed their stale review via 0575bf2 December 3, 2025 13:44

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of paulmedynski December 3, 2025 13:45 View session

Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of paulmedynski December 3, 2025 13:50

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

paulmedynski previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

cheenamalhotra previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

- Added back a few packages specifically for .NET Framework and Stand…

dec7e69

…ard 2.0. - Removed some unused packages. - Removed .NET 10 targets from CI pipeline runs.

paulmedynski dismissed stale reviews from cheenamalhotra and themself via dec7e69 December 3, 2025 19:57

paulmedynski approved these changes Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/netfx/ref/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/netfx/ref/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

mdaigle reviewed Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

mdaigle reviewed Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

mdaigle reviewed Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.csproj Show resolved Hide resolved

mdaigle approved these changes Dec 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

Adding support for .NET 10 #3686

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Adding support for .NET 10 #3686

Conversation

priyankatiwari08 commented Oct 13, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Issues

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

paulmedynski left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mdaigle commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

priyankatiwari08 commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

apoorvdeshmukh commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

priyankatiwari08 commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

priyankatiwari08 commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Uh oh!

paulmedynski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Frulfump commented Nov 15, 2025

Uh oh!

ErikEJ commented Nov 15, 2025

Uh oh!

Frulfump commented Nov 15, 2025

Uh oh!

paulmedynski commented Nov 15, 2025

Uh oh!

C0nquistadore commented Nov 18, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cheenamalhotra commented Dec 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

paulmedynski left a comment

priyankatiwari08 commented Oct 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading

paulmedynski left a comment •

edited

Loading

cheenamalhotra commented Dec 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading